How Many Interview Rounds Is Too Many? (And What It Says About Your Hiring Process)

Authored by: Friddy Hoegener, Co-Founder & Head of Recruiting at SCOPE Recruiting

Most companies think eight rounds of interviews shows thoroughness. It doesn't. It shows misalignment. I talk to candidates every week who drop out of hiring processes because the process signaled something broken. When a candidate goes through six, seven, eight interviews and still can't get a decision, they're seeing a company where stakeholders can't agree and hiring managers don't have the authority to actually hire.

Table of Contents

• Why Interview Fatigue Is Really Happening

• How Many Interview Rounds Actually Make Sense

• What's Really Broken in Your Hiring Process

• How to Fix Your Hiring Process

Why Interview Fatigue Is Really Happening

Before you add another interview round, understand what's actually causing the problem.

Stakeholders aren't aligned before you start hiring. 

The job description says one thing. The hiring manager wants something else. Finance has different salary expectations. The VP who has to approve the hire wasn't involved in defining the role. So you schedule more interviews hoping someone will figure it out along the way.

Hiring managers don't have real decision-making authority. 

They can interview candidates, but they can't actually make the hire without sign-off from three other people who each want their own interview round. 

No one agrees on evaluation criteria upfront. 

One interviewer cares about technical skills. Another cares about culture fit. A third wants to see leadership potential. Since no one defined what matters most before starting, you need round after round to cover everything everyone thinks is important.

You're copying what other companies do without understanding why. 

Big tech companies run candidates through multiple rounds because they get millions of applications and one bad engineering hire could cost tens of millions. That is different for a 200-person company. Your risk profile is completely different, but you've adopted their process anyway.

Companies have designed bloated, bureaucratic hiring processes out of fear of making bad hires, but the treatment has become worse.

Your HR team is understaffed. 

Leaner headcounts mean people who don't know how to interview effectively are being pulled in to conduct interviews anyway. More rounds feel safer than empowering undertrained interviewers to make real assessments.

Everyone wants to be involved. 

Including stakeholders feels collaborative. But when six people each need to meet the candidate separately, you're not improving the decision. You're just slowing it down.

This is the pattern I kept seeing: companies that take two months and eight rounds to hire someone could have made the same decision after three rounds if they'd done the alignment work upfront.

How Many Interview Rounds Actually Make Sense

The right number of rounds depends on the role, but there are general guidelines that work across most organizations.

Entry-Level Roles: 3-4 Rounds Maximum

What you need to assess:

• Basic technical competency

• Ability to learn and follow direction

• Culture fit and communication skills

• Work ethic and reliability

Typical structure:

1. Phone screen (30 min): Recruiter assesses basic qualifications, communication, and interest level

2. Hiring manager interview (45-60 min): Technical assessment and fit for the specific role

3. Team interview or working session (60 min): Meet 2-3 team members or complete a practical task

4. Final decision: References and offer

Entry-level candidates need to demonstrate they can do the job and fit the team. You don't need six stakeholders to confirm someone can handle basic responsibilities.

Mid-Level Roles: 4-5 Rounds Maximum

What you need to assess:

• Depth of technical expertise

• Problem-solving and independent decision-making

• Ability to mentor or lead others

• Track record of measurable impact

Typical structure:

1. Phone screen (30 min): Recruiter confirms experience level and salary expectations

2. Hiring manager interview (60 min): Deep dive into experience and specific accomplishments

3. Technical or case interview (60-90 min): Solve a realistic problem or present past work

4. Team/peer interviews (60 min): Meet 2-4 people they'd work closely with

5. Final stakeholder meeting (30-45 min): Brief conversation with director or VP level

Mid-level hires need to prove they can operate independently and drive results. The team needs to meet them, and leadership needs to sign off. Five rounds max.

Executive Roles: 5-7 Rounds Maximum

What you need to assess:

• Strategic thinking and vision

• Leadership philosophy and team-building ability

• Cultural fit with senior leadership

• Ability to drive transformation or manage complexity

Typical structure:

1. Recruiter or search firm screen (45 min): Confirm interest, experience, and comp expectations

2. Hiring manager interview (90 min): Strategic discussion and leadership philosophy

3. Peer interviews (2-3 sessions, 60 min each): Meet other VPs or senior leaders

4. Board or C-suite presentation (60-90 min): Present strategic plan or lead case discussion

5. Cultural fit interviews (1-2 sessions): Meet with team members or tour operations

6. Final decision meeting (45 min): CEO or board approval

Executive hires impact the entire organization and need broader buy-in. But even here, seven rounds should be the absolute maximum. More than that signals indecision, not thoroughness.

Take these steps:

• Map out your current process by role level

• Count how many interviews you're actually conducting

• Identify redundant rounds where multiple people assess the same criteria

• Cut anything beyond these guidelines unless you have a specific, defendable reason

What's Really Broken In Your Hiring Process

Lack of clear decision-making authority. 

When hiring managers need approval from three levels up before they can make a hire, it creates a bottleneck. The issue isn't always that managers lack judgment - sometimes they just haven't been given the training or framework to evaluate candidates confidently. Other times, the organization has created a structure where decision-making authority sits too high up. Either way, the result is the same: more interview rounds to get enough stakeholder buy-in, which slows everything down.

No one owns the hiring decision. 

When five people interview a candidate but no single person has final say, you end up with consensus by committee. Everyone needs to feel comfortable with the choice, which means addressing every concern through additional rounds. Meanwhile, strong candidates accept offers from competitors who made faster decisions.

Evaluation criteria change mid-process. 

Round three reveals the candidate actually needs SAP experience that wasn't in the job description. Round five introduces a new stakeholder who cares about something completely different. By round seven, you're effectively assessing a different role than you started with. This happens when stakeholders aren't aligned before the process begins.

Redundant assessment. 

Three different people ask the same behavioral questions. Four people separately assess "culture fit" without defining what that means. You're not gathering new information with each round - you're just repeating the same evaluation because no one divided up the assessment responsibilities upfront.

Fear of making a mistake. 

Sometimes one bad hire from years ago creates lasting caution. No one wants to be the person who recommended the wrong candidate, so additional interview rounds feel safer. The thinking is that more rounds equal more diligence. But volume doesn't replace clarity about what you're actually evaluating.

Most companies could cut their interview rounds in half and make better hiring decisions if they aligned stakeholders before starting the process, rather than using interviews to work out what they actually need.

How to Fix Your Hiring Process

Step 1: Align Stakeholders Before You Post the Job

Before a single interview happens, get everyone in a room (or on a call) and agree on:

• The actual role requirements. The must-haves versus nice-to-haves.

• Evaluation criteria. What are the top 3-5 things this person needs to demonstrate? Rank them.

• Compensation range. Finance, HR, and the hiring manager need to agree before anyone talks to candidates.

• Decision-making authority. Who makes the final call? Who needs to be involved versus just informed?

• Interview structure. Who interviews at what stage? What is each person specifically assessing?

Step 2: Empower Your Hiring Managers

Hiring managers should be able to make hiring decisions. If they can't, your process will always be slow and bloated.

• Give them training. Most managers have never been taught how to interview effectively. Train them on structured interviews, behavioral questions, and how to assess specific competencies.

• Give them a framework. Provide scorecards, interview guides, and clear criteria. 

• Give them authority. A hiring manager should be able to say "I want to hire this person" and have that be the decision, pending references and background checks. If they need sign-off from three other people who barely interact with the role, you've created a bottleneck.

• Hold them accountable. If they make bad hires consistently, that's a performance issue. But don't solve it by requiring more approvals. Solve it by improving their hiring judgment.

Step 3: Create a Structured Interview Process

• Define what each round assesses. Round one: basic qualifications and interest. Round two: technical skills. Round three: team fit. Don't repeat the same assessment in every round.

• Assign interviewer responsibilities. Each person should know exactly what they're evaluating. "Get a feel for them" is not an assignment.

• Use scorecards. After each interview, interviewers should rate candidates on specific criteria (1-5 scale works). This forces clarity and makes it easier to compare candidates objectively.

• Set time limits. Decide upfront: we're making a decision within two weeks. This forces you to structure efficiently instead of letting rounds multiply.

• Combine interviews when possible. Instead of five separate 30-minute interviews, do two 90-minute sessions where the candidate meets multiple people. You get the same information in half the time.

Step 4: Replace Consensus Hiring with Clear Decision Rights

• One person should own the decision. Usually the hiring manager. They can gather input, but the final call is theirs.

• Distinguish between "must interview" and "should meet." Not everyone needs interview time. Some people just need to meet the finalist for 15 minutes before the offer.

• Use a RACI matrix. Who is Responsible for the decision? Who is Accountable (has veto)? Who should be Consulted? Who just needs to be Informed? This clarity alone can cut rounds in half.

Step 5: Track and Improve

After each hire, debrief:

• How many rounds did we actually need? Could we have made the decision sooner?

• Where did the process break down? Did stakeholders disagree? Did we assess the same thing multiple times?

• How did the candidate experience the process? Ask your new hire for honest feedback.

What to Remember

Interview fatigue isn't about candidates being impatient or unwilling to go through a rigorous process. It's about companies using interviews to compensate for internal dysfunction.

When stakeholders aren't aligned, hiring managers aren't empowered, and evaluation criteria keep shifting, the only response is to add more rounds. More conversations. More people.

Your hiring process is a signal to candidates about what it's like to work at your company. If your process is chaotic, bureaucratic, and slow, that's what candidates assume your company culture is like. If your process is clear, efficient, and respectful of their time, that's the signal you send instead.

——————————————————————————————————————————

 

Friddy Hoegener is the Co-Founder and Head of Recruiting at SCOPE Recruiting, a boutique firm specialising in supply chain and manufacturing talent. As a former supply chain professional himself, he now connects companies with the right talent to solve critical operational challenges.