What Can Be Learned from Overhauling the Performance Review Process?
Revamping a company’s performance review system is a complex task, but learning from those who have done it can provide invaluable insights. Drawing on the experiences of CEOs and Operations Managers, we’ve gathered seven transformative stories. From standardizing for clarity to boosting employee satisfaction with quarterly reviews, discover what these leaders have learned through the process of overhauling performance evaluations.
- Standardize for Clarity and Action
- Align Reviews with Company Goals
- Data-Driven Feedback Enhances ROI
- Solicit Employee Input for Process Design
- Transition to Dynamic Quarterly Reviews
- Continuous Feedback Drives Culture Shift
- Quarterly Reviews Boost Employee Satisfaction
Standardize for Clarity and Action
When building a team, I quickly realized that our performance review process needed more clarity so all employees understood their areas of improvement and strengths. We needed a standardized process that provided actionable steps.
After revamping the process, our team learned the importance of ongoing communication with employees and managers. A performance review isn’t the time for surprises. These conversations should be carried into one-on-one meetings as well, so employees are aware of how their managers are measuring success throughout the year, not just once per quarter.
This transparency is key to building a culture of feedback where everyone sees how their performance is tied to the team’s or company’s performance. Introducing self-assessments for employees also allows them to reflect on their performance.
It’s important that companies also train people managers on de-biasing performance reviews by providing education on recognizing and addressing unconscious bias and implementing standardized evaluation criteria. This ensures that raises and promotions are based on merit.
Latesha Byrd
CEO, Perfeqta
Align Reviews with Company Goals
In 2022, we updated our review process as our old process was outdated and didn’t reflect the company’s current goals and values. We wanted to create a performance review process that was fair, transparent, and aligned with our company’s mission and objectives.
So, we first analyzed the current process and identified its weaknesses. Then we conducted a survey to gather feedback from team members on what they thought about the existing process and what changes they would like to see. Based on their feedback, we designed a new process that included clear performance metrics, regular check-ins between team leaders and employees, and a peer-review system.
We are also in the process of training our team leaders to provide constructive feedback and set achievable goals for their team members. We made sure that the new process was easy to understand and accessible to everyone. Plus, we implemented an employee recognition program to acknowledge and reward outstanding performance.
Tom Molnar
Operations Manager, Fit Design
Data-Driven Feedback Enhances ROI
Reflecting on the period of transformation within Omniconvert, a significant milestone was the comprehensive revision of our performance review process. Recognizing the need for more dynamic and meaningful assessments, we shifted from traditional, often subjective evaluations to a more data-driven and continuous feedback mechanism. This overhaul was not merely about changing forms and frequencies but deeply integrating the insights derived from the Phillips ROI Methodology to understand and maximize the return on investment in our teams’ development.
This approach enabled us to correlate training and development efforts directly with performance outcomes and business impact. Through this experience, I learned the critical importance of making decisions based on data and the profound impact of investing in a culture that values continuous improvement and growth. It reinforced my belief in being agile and responsive to the evolving needs of our teams and the markets we serve, ensuring our leadership practices remain as innovative as our solutions.
Valentin Radu
CEO & Founder, Blogger, Speaker, Podcaster, Omniconvert
Solicit Employee Input for Process Design
At Zibtek, we underwent a significant overhaul of our performance review process to better align with our company culture and values, as well as to address feedback from employees regarding the effectiveness and fairness of the existing system. One key learning from this experience was the importance of soliciting input from employees at all levels of the organization to ensure that the new process would meet their needs and expectations.
We began by conducting surveys and focus groups to gather feedback on the strengths and weaknesses of the current performance review process and to identify areas for improvement. This input was invaluable in shaping the design of the new process, as it allowed us to incorporate perspectives from diverse stakeholders and ensure buy-in and support across the organization.
Based on this feedback, we implemented several changes to our performance review process, including:
Increased Transparency and Communication: We implemented a more transparent and ongoing feedback mechanism that encouraged regular check-ins between managers and employees throughout the year, rather than relying solely on annual reviews. This helped foster a culture of continuous feedback and improvement, empowering employees to take ownership of their development and growth.
Focus on Goal Setting and Development: We placed greater emphasis on goal setting and professional development planning as part of the performance review process. This involved aligning individual goals with company objectives, providing resources and support for skill development, and offering opportunities for career advancement within the organization.
Peer Feedback and 360-Degree Reviews: We introduced peer feedback and 360-degree reviews to provide employees with a more holistic and well-rounded assessment of their performance. This allowed employees to receive feedback from colleagues, clients, and stakeholders, providing valuable insights into areas for improvement and areas of strength.
Training and Support for Managers: We provided training and support for managers to effectively conduct performance reviews and deliver feedback in a constructive and meaningful way. This included training on active listening, giving and receiving feedback, and managing performance conversations with empathy and respect.
Cache Merrill
Founder, Zibtek
Transition to Dynamic Quarterly Reviews
We once had to completely revamp our outdated annual performance review process, as it wasn’t providing timely or actionable feedback. Here’s how we tackled it:
1. Shift to Quarterly Reviews: We moved from an annual to a quarterly review system, incorporating regular one-on-ones for continuous dialogue about performance and goals.
2. 360-Degree Feedback: We introduced 360-degree feedback to ensure employees received comprehensive insights from all angles—peers, subordinates, and managers.
3. Training for Managers: Recognizing the critical role of effective feedback, we trained managers on how to communicate constructively and use the new system efficiently.
4. Leveraging Technology: We implemented new HR software to facilitate goal tracking and make the review process more transparent.
What I Learned:
– Adaptability is Essential: Tailoring the process to fit various team needs was key.
– Never Underestimate Training: Equipping managers with the right skills was crucial to the transition.
– Continuous Feedback Loop: Regularly collecting feedback on the new process and making adjustments proved vital for ongoing success.
This overhaul taught me that performance reviews must be a dynamic tool for development, not just an administrative task. The changes led to improved employee engagement and a culture that supports growth and open communication.
Ana Alipat
Recruitment Team Lead, Dayjob Recruitment
Continuous Feedback Drives Culture Shift
Overhauling our company’s performance-review process was a pivotal moment. We shifted from traditional evaluations to a more continuous, feedback-driven approach. This change fostered a culture where open communication and continuous improvement became the norm.
The experience taught us that aligning performance metrics with our mission and values not only enhances productivity but also strengthens team cohesion and supports our vision of enabling digital teams to work more effectively and efficiently.
Dan Ponomarenko
CEO, Webvizio
Quarterly Reviews Boost Employee Satisfaction
I’ve seen how traditional performance reviews have created anxiety rather than excitement and engagement in employees.
With the realization that change was needed, we moved from the ratings-based and biannual model to a much more dynamic, feedback-driven approach. That’s really how we started doing quarterly reviews—that is, more developmental and less judgmental. One of the learnings from this was to make this process truly two-way, with employees as active participants and not just recipients of the process.
This was not without its difficulties. At the outset, most managers and employees felt that this would lead to the review process becoming an intrusive exercise, given the higher frequency of reviews. But with an implementation that ingrained the culture of improvement and support, perceptions underwent a sea change. The newly implemented process within the first year brought about a 40% increase in employee satisfaction with the review process.
Much of this has been successful because of the iterative nature of implementation: we’d use feedback from each quarter to refine our approach in order to make sure it was really meeting our teams’ needs and fitting in with our broader organizational values.
Hamzah Khadim
President & CEO, Logik Digital
Submit Your Answer
Would you like to submit an alternate answer to the question, “Can you describe a time when you had to overhaul your company’s performance review process and what you learned from that experience?”